Does it sound like a major shift in how we were used to SEO? Is it really that dramatic?
For some websites, yes. In the USA, it has been shown that if an AI Overview starts appearing for a certain keyword, the click-through rate from organic results can drop by as much as 30% – sometimes even more. The AI response is often sufficient – the user reads it and does not click on any website, even if your site is listed as a source.
So being mentioned in the AI overview doesn't guarantee a win?
Exactly. It is not a guarantee of traffic. While the AI Overview may mention you, it does not necessarily lead to a click. Therefore, it makes sense to think about how to incorporate something that AI cannot convey – interactive elements, personal experiences, data visualizations, or deeper context. This gives the user a reason to click on your website after all.
What does this mean for companies that want to remain relevant in search results?
The approach to content will change. Not in the sense that we should write for AI, but that we need to help it understand what our website offers. Clear structure, headings in the form of questions, concise answers, emphasis on relevance. Working with question-based keyword research and schemas like FAQ is also helpful. AI needs to understand what is on the page – and we must make it easier for it.
So SEO is not completely shifting elsewhere, but a new layer is being added?
Exactly. The basic principles of SEO (quality content, technical processing, relevant keywords) still apply. Google itself has confirmed that no special tricks are needed for AI Overviews, just follow the Search Essentials as before
(developers.google.com). What is changing, however, is the emphasis on Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) – that is, optimizing content to serve as an answer. In practice, this means you should structure and write content so that AI can easily understand it, extract its essence, and quote it.